The MoXFo initiative - adherence: Exercise adherence, compliance and sustainability among people with multiple sclerosis: An overview and roadmap for research.

We know very little about exercise adherence, compliance and sustainability in multiple sclerosis (MS), yet adherence is seemingly important for yielding immediate and sustained health benefits. This paper is focused on exercise adherence, compliance and sustainability in the context of informing research and practice involving MS. This focus is critical for clarifying terminology for future research and providing a roadmap guiding clinical research and practice. Our objective was accomplished through a narrative summary of the literature by a panel of experts on exercise adherence from the Moving Exercise Research in Multiple Sclerosis Forward (MoXFo) initiative and a concluding summary of the state of the literature and future research directions. The panel of experts identified three overall themes (Background and Importance; Understanding and Promoting Exercise Adherence, Compliance and Sustainability and Challenges to Exercise Adherence, Compliance and Sustainability) that represented a categorization of nine subthemes. These overall themes and subthemes formed the basis of our recommendations regarding future research broadly involving exercise adherence in MS. Overall, there is limited evidence on rates and determinants of exercise adherence and compliance in MS, and little is known about techniques and interventions for immediate and long-term exercise behaviour change.

Considerations for Implementing the Post-Concussion Collegiate Return-to-Learn Protocol in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Power 5 Conferences.

OBJECTIVE: Although concussions affect millions of young adults annually, researchers have yet to assess factors that may affect future implementation of post-concussion academic supports within higher education. Therefore, we sought to evaluate preimplementation outcomes of the acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and readiness for change of the Post-Concussion Collegiate Return-to-Learn (RTL) Protocol among university stakeholders. SETTING: An online survey. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample ( N = 49; 63.3% female) of athletic trainers (ATs; n = 25, age = 30.1 ± 7.6 years) and university faculty/staff ( n = 24, age = 38.3 ± 9.9 years) across the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Power 5 Conferences from January to February 2022. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. MAIN MEASURES: To compare preimplementation outcome measures using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) regarding the RTL protocol between ATs and university faculty/staff. Additional outcomes included internal and external barriers to implementing at their respective institutions. Statistical analyses were conducted using Mann-Whitney U tests, with effect sizes estimated using eta-squared coefficient (η 2 ). RESULTS: Quantitative analyses yielded no statistically significant group differences ( P s > .05) across the AIM, FIM, and IAM outcomes, indicating both groups perceived the protocol to be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate. Moreover, ATs reported higher agreement regarding motivation, desire, willingness to do "whatever it takes," commitment, and determination to implement the novel protocol than faculty/staff. Further, ATs reported higher agreement regarding their institution's confidence to keep track of its progress, support adjustment, maintain momentum, manage institutional politics, coordinate tasks, encourage investment, and handle the challenges of future implementation of the RTL protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest ATs and university faculty/staff across the NCAA Power 5 Conferences may perceive the RTL protocol to be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate for future use; however, noteworthy internal and external barriers may influence its uptake. Future research should utilize implementation frameworks to support the protocol's adoption and reach.

Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in the application of smartphone applications and wearable motion sensors among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the accuracy and precision of common smartphone applications and motion sensors for measuring steps taken by MS patients while walking on a treadmill. METHODS: Forty-five MS patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 1.0-5.0) underwent two 500-step walking trials at comfortable walking speed on a treadmill. Participants wore five motion sensors: the Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer (Yamax), the UP2 and UP Move (Jawbone), and the Flex and One (Fitbit). The smartphone applications were Health (Apple), Health Mate (Withings), and Moves (ProtoGeo Oy). RESULTS: The Fitbit One had the best absolute (mean = 490.6 steps, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 485.6-495.5 steps) and relative accuracy (1.9% error), and absolute (SD = 16.4) and relative precision (coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.0), for the first 500-step walking trial; this was repeated with the second trial. Relative accuracy was correlated with slower walking speed for the first (rs = -.53) and second (rs = -.53) trials. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the waist-worn Fitbit One is the most precise and accurate sensor for measuring steps when walking on a treadmill, but future research is needed (testing the device across a broader range of disability, at different speeds, and in real-life walking conditions) before inclusion in clinical research and practice with MS patients.